Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been - Essay Example The story depicts Connie as a youthful and excellent young lady who experiences childhood in the Suburbia in the years between 1960. During this period, the creator depicts there were not many lovely young ladies who might be resolved to open their excellence to the whole society. In spite of the fact that the little youngsters were lovely, the vast majority of the guardians settled on their girl to remain inside. Joyce Carol Oates the creator of the story, â€Å"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been† outlines that since Connie was youthful, she invest the greater part of her energy before a mirror affirming her magnificence. This made Connie’s mother disturbs and annoyed since her girl was sitting around in affirming her excellence as opposed to focusing on other life angles (Oates 1). Sooner or later, the creator, Joyce cites in the story â€Å"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been† that, â€Å"stop sitting around idly and ogling at yourself, who do you think you will be, you think your pretty†. Joyce recognizes that the mother was incited with the occasions her girl sat around idly in affirming and boasting her magnificence. Connie additionally had a senior sister, June however she was not as wonderful as the youthful and alluring Connie showed up. In spite of the fact that June was the oldest of the two, one would botch Connie to be the principal conceived. June was more seasoned at the age of twenty-four and still lived with the guardians. She worked in a secondary school as the secretary and set aside the greatest cash she could to save the family (Oates 4). June was blameless and never raised any hell to the family as Connie never really rest of the family. June consistently hear her out mother’s words and adhered to each guidance given. This was absolutely in opposition to the sister, Connie, who chooses to tune in to the companions. In the story, â€Å"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been†, the creator, Joyce distinguishes that Connie proceeded with her patterns and even began going out with companions. This exacerbated things after she was acquainted with

The Research Plan of the Company Telstra Sample for Students

Question: Examine about Research Plan. Answer: Foundation of the organization: Telstra is considered as a standout amongst other media transmission organizations in Australia. The organization gives data and correspondence administrations to the individuals everywhere degree. On the off chance that the information has been thought of, the organization serves the clients with 9.6 million fixed line administrations and 9.3 million versatile administrations (Telstra., 2017). Among them 3.3 million administrations are 3G administrations. The organization not just offers essential types of assistance to the Australian organizations and homes yet additionally offers support of nearby separation and worldwide calf from and to Australia. The internet providers of the organization are furnished with the brand name of BigPond. The organization isn't just in the matter of telecom yet additionally caters the clients with the administrations of TV link and membership of FOXTEL. Telstra has a portion of the upper hands over different organizations in Australia. The greatest bit of leeway of the organization is its riches and size. This recommend its s extreme for the contenders to rival Telstra by covering the Australia with such an enormous remote correspondence inclusion. The corporate duties of the organization are to give the steady employments and the wages to the representatives with the goal that they can hold in the association. Notwithstanding being such a decent organization, there are a few situations where it has been discovered that the staff individuals from the organization particularly the sakes staff has been harassed by their seniors because of work targets. Numerous previous Telstra representatives have given the data with respect to the instances of tormenting of staff at the working environment. Research foundation: This examination is led so as to decide different parts of staff harassing at the work environment. This point is chosen for explore in light of the fact that there are numerous issues identified with the subject. A portion of the organizations don't consider staff tormenting as an issue at all and some make a move on such issues (O'Leary, 2013). Along these lines, it is required to examine about the real circumstance in regards to the theme. Telstra is chosen as the organization to complete this exploration in light of the fact that numerous cases have been caught wind of this organization by its ex-workers. This exploration gives an extent of investigating the thoughts identified with the point with the assistance of considering companys structure. Survey of writing: Working environment tormenting is the subject that has been talked about by numerous scientists. This is on the grounds that the subject doesn't give a quantitative basic information of the occasion however it must be asses by watching the work environment (Silverman, 2013). Work environment tormenting is of various sorts. Singular tormenting is one of the sorts of work environment harassing that can be challenged as the abuse or the unfortunate behavior with the representatives over and again with the practices, for example, mortification, harm of execution and so on by the work environment harassing and injury foundation. Harassing is a lot of not the same as hostility. This is on the grounds that hostility can be appeared by single demonstration of the individual yet harassing is the rehashed demonstration against the objective (Marshall Rossman, 2014). This is an on-going procedure to make the sentiment of disappointment among the objective. It doesn't utilize any physical device to hurt the individual yet it influence the brain of the objective severely that makes the sentiment of disappointment and bothering. There are numerous instances of harassing, for example, Invalid analysis of the individual Fault with invalid evidences Treated the objective not the same as different workers Social detachment of the objective Checking the objective without fail Mortification Offending in fro of others Making jokes of the people execution of physical appearance All the above expressed exercises should be possible out of the work environment however when these exercises happen at the working environment then it is named as working environment tormenting (Creswell, 2013). Mobbing is one of the sorts of tormenting those outcomes in bunch harassing. In this sort of harassing, an individual spread any of the bits of gossip about the objective individual and include them to take an interest in the tormenting action to menace that target and this outcomes in abdication of the that individual from the working environment as it makes mental weight on the objective and influence the presentation too (Baxter Jack, 2008). individuals menace others Tormenting conduct of the individuals has incredible range. In corporate world, there are numerous reasons that create harassing. A portion of the causes, for example, serious condition of the working environment, social inadequacy or predominance, intensity of pecking order and so forth. (Maxwell, 2012). it is human instinct that on the off chance that the opposition exist at the spot, at that point individuals either attempt to stretch out beyond somebody or either attempt to pull the entertainer back. This propensity and nature of individuals permit them to menace others. Here and there harassing occurs from both the sides and these outcomes in messy governmental issues at the work environment. Harassing doesn't mean affecting others or being intense yet it is about the distinction in the conduct of harsh unfortunate behavior and discourtesy towards somebody. Three kinds of menace characters have been recognized. The first is victor (Noor, 2008). This individual domineering jerks others on the ground of the force. These individuals attempt to control others and attempt to menace the individual they need to administer on. Another sort of character is entertainer who attempts to menace others on the ground of execution level. These individuals have low confidence and they don't know of their exhibition and along these lines, attempt to pull back others execution. The last one is the controllers. Controllers are the individuals who are narrow minded in nature. They attempt to assume acknowledgment for others work moreover. Menace can't be named as conflict of characters; the demonstration is based on silly reasons so as to prevail upon the opposition the greater part of the occasions (Hoel, Sheehan, Cooper Einarsen, 2011). As indicated by the specialists, harassing is the demonstration that generally directed by the individuals who are defeatist in nature and have uncertainty of losing something. Harm to the objective individual: Tormenting somebody brings about difficult issue of mental and intense subject matters for the objective individual. The harm or the issues incorporate mischief to confidence of the individual. This makes nervousness, discouragement, cerebral pain, sleep deprivation, decline in execution level and so forth. The demonstration of harassing at the work environment influences the objective individual as well as influence the organization in negative manner (Beale Hoel, 2011). The administration of the organization needs to burn through their time settling the issues responded to harassing at the working environment. It might likewise influence the picture of the organization has locales like glass-entryway permit the ex-workers or the present representatives to compose the surveys about the organization and awful audits for the organization influence its future position. The executives botches: The executives regularly doesn't pay attention to the issues of tormenting (Namie, 2009).This is on the grounds that it appears to be whimsical to them to determine the little issues of the workers. The executives some of the time accuse the objective party if there should arise an occurrence of harassing and request that they disregard the other individual significantly on account of the individual who I tormenting the objective is at the more significant position authority position (Saunders, Huynh Goodman-Delahunty, 2007). There are no such arrangements and laws against tormenting at the work environment and hence this theme stayed immaculate by law. Research issue: Research issue can be characterized as the issues that are available in the exploration topic.it are essential to characterize the issue since it goes about as the base for allover research. The examination issue that should be talked about this exploration plan is about the issues of tormenting at the working environment (Bartlett, 2011). It has been recognized that numerous representatives at celebrated organizations, for example, Telstra are confronting the issues of staff tormenting by others. In Telstra the business group is confronting this issue by their seniors. Research goal or questions: The exploration goals are not quite the same as research issues. Research targets can be characterized as the point of the exploration (Needham, 2017). The exploration goals or questions that are confined at the underlying phase of the examination should be replied after the examination gets over. Following inquiries should be addressed in regards to this examination: Are Telstra workers confronting staff harassing? What kind of tormenting they are confronting? Aftereffects of harassing at the working environment? Does the board meddle in harassing issue? Research plan: Research configuration can be characterized as the layout of how the exploration or the examination should be finished. It encourages the scientist to delineate the exercises that should be led in arrangement. It includes the sort of research and the techniques that are utilized to help this examination. In this examination type is exploratory in nature (Glassdoor. 2017). Exploratory research is done so as to take care of the difficult that isn't obviously inquired about till now. Exploratory research permits the analyst to investigate various realities about the examination by various examinations. In this exploration, the specialist will investigate the readings done by him and attempts to discover the power of issues nearness in the association. The association that has been chosen for leading the exploration is Telstra (Einarsen, Hoel, Zapf Cooper, 2010). Sort of research: There are significantly two sorts of research, subjective and quantitative. Quantitative research is done so as to investigate the information and measurements identified with the examination issue. The amount explore is done when the numbers are included and the aftereffect of these kinds of research is precise and confirm. Then again subjective research is about the force of the nearness of the issue (Caponecchia Wyatt, 2011). Numbers and information are not concentrated in these sorts of research on the grounds that the quality can't be estimated. Quality must be watched and accepted by the occasions happened identified with the issues. In this exploration, the subjective investigation is done in light of the fact that the scientist needs to examine the realities about the nearness of staff tormenting at the working environment.

12 Things NOT to Include in a Query Letter

12 Things NOT to Include in a Query Letter If you want to be published in a magazine or by a traditional book publisher, the chances are that youll have to submit a query letter at some point. At its most basic, a query letter is simply a letter that details your project and your writing credentials to a prospective editor, agent, or publisher. Yet the query letter is a source of great angst for writers because it is often the only piece of information that a gatekeeper will see before either rejecting your work or asking to see more. When one piece of paper controls that much of your destiny, the pressure to get it right is enormous. Its the first step on your way to getting to submit your work. Tons of books and online resources exist to help you write the perfect letter. However, in addition to the things that you should do, there are plenty of things you need to avoid, as well. Here are twelve things that you should never put in a query letter unless a fast rejection is your goal. Mistakes This is the first contact that an editor or agent has with your work. If its riddled with typos and grammatical errors, they arent going to take a chance on anything more from you because youve already demonstrated that you are not capable of submitting error-free work. Proofread, rewrite, and polish that letter until its perfect, and then have someone else (or several someones) read it, too, to make certain that youre not overlooking something. You want your letter to show you as a competent, careful writer, not as someone who dashes off stuff and submits it without a care. You always want to be improving your writing skills. Gifts or bribes Writers will sometimes include items like tickets to shows, homemade items, or even money in an effort to get an agent or editor to look at their work. This strategy will always fail. First, its unethical for an editor or agent to accept any sort of gift or bribe. Even if they accepted the gift and swore that it didnt influence their decision about your work, the perception would be there, should word of the transaction get out. (And publishing is a small world, so word would get out!) A reputable agent or publishing house would not risk their reputation by accepting any sort of gift. Second, since they arent accepting it, it becomes something for them to deal with, either by returning it to you or throwing it away. See number 9, below, for more about why agents and editors dont want extra stuff. Anything that reveals your stalker tendencies Its recommended that you mention in your letter where you heard about the agent or editor, or any personal contact you may have had, such as a meeting at a conference. What isnt recommended is that you mention that you know the person has three kids, that they go to such-and-such church, and that you know that their family went to Barbados last year. If you Google the agent or check up on them on Facebook, keep your findings to yourself. Keep any mention of what you know about the agent or editor to the professional realm, only. Arrogance Yes, you should give the agent or editor some clue about where your work fits into the marketplace. If its similar to a certain successful work, or if it combines elements from two or more successful works, its okay to mention that briefly. Whats not okay is to talk about how your book will be the next bestseller, how it will outsell anything by J.K. Rowling, or how it will make millions for you and anyone lucky enough to publish your work. Keep it real, please. If youre this arrogant and unrealistic in the query letter, the agent or editor is already thinking that working with you will be too much trouble. Over the top language You want to avoid all over the top language, cuteness, rudeness, or crudeness just to get attention. Your book or article may rely on crude humor, bad language, or a unique voice and you want that to show through in your letter. A little of this can be fine if it is truly needed to represent your work and if it is handled well. But when you resort to this type of language and/or style in an effort to shock or get attention, it will fail. If your whole letter is nothing but F-bombs, baby talk, or crude jokes with no purpose, expect to be rejected. Your age/photo You want your work to be judged on its own merits. That means removing yourself from the equation as much as possible. You dont want an agent or editor to know how old you are or what you look like until they are so captivated by your work that age and looks dont matter. Most gatekeepers will disavow that age or looks sway their decision but bias, even if unintentional, can play a role. Its somewhat true in our visual world that younger, better-looking, TV-worthy authors are in demand. If an editor knows how good (or bad) you would look on TV, on a book jacket, at appearances, or in a book trailer that may sway their decisions. Send only your work and dont include any mention of your age or a photo that you think would be perfect on your book jacket. Anything not relevant When you talk about yourself and your credentials in your query letter, only mention credits and accomplishments that are relevant to the work in question. Dont include the fact that you won your 8th-grade writing contest. Dont list your work history unless your work is relevant to the book or article. Dont mention your hobbies, favorite foods, movies, or books, either. Agents and editors do not care that you love Twinkies and Pretty Woman. They only care about the project you are pitching. Bizarre fonts, papers, and formatting You think youre making your submission stand out by submitting it in a 14-point calligraphy font on hot pink paper. The agent or editor thinks youre being annoying and hurting their eyes. Stick to the accepted conventions. Anything not requested Agents and editors are drowning in paper. The last thing they need from you is anything that they did not specifically request. This means no complete manuscripts or even chapters, no copies of your self-published book, no resumes, no cute drawings that would make perfect cover art, a DVD of your ideal book trailer, and no head shots. You may think youre saving the agent time by making all of this available to them, but they only see more crap they have to dispose of or send back to you. Only submit what is requested. If an agent or editor wants more, theyll ask for it. Multiple projects A query letter should be for one article or book. Dont submit one letter that covers the three manuscripts youve got stuffed in a drawer, or the fifteen articles youve got on your hard drive. One letter = one project. Always. Incomplete projects Only query a finished manuscript or a fully fleshed out article/non-fiction book proposal that you are ready to write if given the go-ahead by an editor. No editor wants to read a fantastic query letter only to hear the writer say, Great. I can have the completed manuscript to you in three months. Maybe four. Youre not querying a half-baked idea here, or a book of which youve only written the first three chapters. Youre not feeling an editor out on whether or not you should continue with the work. Youre querying something which is complete and ready to go, or you need to wait until it is. Anything personal about you Ive already mentioned that you shouldnt include a photo or mention anything irrelevant in your query letter, but you should refrain from mentioning any other personal information, as well. You may think youre bonding with the agent if you tell him or her that you have three dogs or that you volunteer at a hospice. You may think youre gaining a sympathy vote if you mention your spouses recent death and lack of life insurance, or if you mention that you are disabled. Agents and editors arent cold, unfeeling people, but the bottom line is that they do not need to know these things about you. Mentioning things like hobbies or pets only takes up valuable space in a letter that needs to be as brief as possible. Worse, mentioning things like disabilities or tragedies brings up the bias argument again and a gatekeeper will likely steer clear to avoid the perception that their decision was somehow influenced by your tragedy. Talk only about your project and leave out anything personal. A query letter is a professional introduction of your work to an agent or editor. As such, it needs to be kept professional in both tone and appearance. It is not a place to showcase your creativity or lifestyle choices. Its not a place to expound upon your literary greatness or to discuss all the things that you and the agent have in common. Since it shouldnt be longer than one page, typed, single spaced, and in 12-point font, you have limited real estate with which to work. Make every sentence count and dont waste them on things that are not relevant or which may actually hurt your chances. (Photo courtesy of Andy)